Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Garcia

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1975No. 914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

The appellant in her first motion for rehearing asserts that this Court erred in assuming certain facts from the plaintiff’s pleadings that were not in evidence. After reviewing the record, we find that the appellant is correct on several of these assertions. For this reason, our original opinion and our opinion on motion for rehearing have been withdrawn and this opinion is substituted therefor.

This is a suit to cancel a mineral deed. Suit was brought by Refugio Garcia, the appellee, against Evila Garcia Rodriguez, Refugio Garcia’s niece. Mr. Garcia sought to cancel…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Scott v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Scott v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  5. McDonald v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Durham v. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Texas Construction Service Co. of Austin, Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Susan Jackson Holden and Terry Holden v. Charles Lyle Holden, as the Independent of the Estate of Rosie Eunice HoldenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Bach v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Southland Capital Corp. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API