Lindo v. Lindo

I respectfully dissent from part I of the majority opinion. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the defendant’s motion and properly dismissed the matter. I would conclude that the trial court did have subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-70 and, therefore, should have denied the plaintiffs motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but should have *653heard the plaintiffs motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Michigan judgment…