Legal Opinion

Jones v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 17, 1914No. 3416PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge. Action by Fred Perkins against Alice Jones and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On March 7, 19.11, in the district court of Hughes county, Fred Perkins, the defendant in error, sued Alice Jones and others, plaintiffs in error, to' foreclose a real estate mortgage, which secured a past-due note for $705. There was judgment in foreclosure, and defendants bring the case here. The agreed statement of facts disclose Perkins to be the owner of, the mortgage; that on June 8, 1906, the land therein described was the allotment of Clarence Barnett, a minor Creek freedman; that on said day he executed a warranty deed thereto to O. D. Smith and wife, who took possession, and on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennock v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Freeman v. . AuldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Johnson v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Gowans v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Schuber v. McDuffeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Deming Inv. Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. United States Bond & Mortgage Co. v. KeaheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Heckman v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. McKee v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API