Legal Opinion

David Joseph Rawls v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1964No. 20983_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s motions to correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, or, in the alternative, to permit withdrawal of his plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 32(d) Federal Rules Criminal Procedure. Appellant claims four grounds for reversal. One, his alleged insanity at the time of his original trial, was not submitted to the district court in the proceeding here appealed from, and will not be considered by this court. The remaining three grounds are closely related and concern the validity of appellant’s waiver of coUn sel and plea of guilty. 1 Appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vincent L. Pilkington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. Donald Bernard Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John Dee Chapin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  2. Turner v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  3. Rawls v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964
  4. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1965
  5. Doshier v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API