Black v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
1DissentJustice Hassell
I dissent. The majority opinion invalidates a statute that for almost 50 years has protected our citizens from being placed in fear of bodily harm by the burning of a cross. The majority concludes that the Constitution of the United States prohibits the General Assembly from enacting this statute. I find no such prohibition in either the Constitution of Virginia or the Constitution of the United States. Without question, the framers of the First Amendment never contemplated that a court would construe that Amendment so that it would permit a person to bum a cross in a manner that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.