Currier v. Henderson
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
LASNIK, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
This action was brought by Carl Currier (“Currier”), David Bar (“Bar”) and Willard Johnson (“Johnson”), three homeless individuals in Seattle, and Seattle Housing and Resource Effort (“SHARE”), an advocacy group that advocates on behalf of the Seattle homeless. Defendants…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Currier v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Currier v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004