Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 24, 1972PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Proctob, J.

This is a products liability case. Plaintiff Harry Finnegan was injured when his right hand was crushed by the ram of a power punch press he was operating for his employer, Arrow Metal Products (Arrow). Finnegan and his wife brought this suit for damages against Havir Manufacturing Corporation (Havir), as manufacturer, and Ralph Hochman & Co. and Wehrheim Machinery Co., as vendor and distributor of the punch press. The causes of action were grounded in negligence and strict liability. It was the plaintiffs’ contention that the punch press…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rhoads v. Service MacHine CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1971

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Balido v. Improved MacHinery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. Zaza v. Marquess and Nell, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API