Legal Opinion

Martel v. Hancock

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 30, 1975No. 6206PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The basic issue in this case, transferred without ruling by Loughlin, J., is whether upon a writ of habeas corpus the superior court has jurisdiction to review actions of the parole board, and if so, the scope of such review. The superior court has concurrent jurisdiction with the supreme court of a writ of habeas corpus (RSA 534:3) which is a proper remedy for this purpose. Petition of LaForest, 110 N.H. 508, 272 A.2d 598 (1970); see Belton v. Vitek, 113 N.H. 183, 304 A.2d 362 (1973); Springer v. Hungerford, 100 N.H. 503, 130 A.2d 538 (1957). Although the issue may now be moot because the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. BoucherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Santiago Defillo, Relator-Appellant v. W. W. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Royer v. State Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Knowles v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Woodman v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. Bussiere v. CunninghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. Petition of Kerry D.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API