Legal Opinion

Enis v. Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Fayette. Tried before-the Hon. S. H. Sprott. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMoOLELLAN, J.

This action is by Harris, MeWhirter & Co. against Enis et al. on an account for goods &c. sold by plaintiffs to defendants. It was commenced by summons and complaint. On the complaint is this endorsement, under section 2773 of the Code : “This action is founded on account verified by affidavit.” At the trial, plaintiffs offered, and against the defendants’ objection were allowed, to introduce in evidence an itemized account, the verification of which was to the effect that it was just, correct, due in part and unpaid. With this account thus verified before the jury, plaintiffs rested, and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pollak v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Alexander v. Moore & KornegaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Pollak v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API