Legal Opinion
ECMC v. Acosta-Conniff
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided May 2, 2016No. CASE NO. 2:15-CV-220-WKWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
W. Keith Watkins, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The bankruptcy court determined that repayment of Appellee Alexandra Elizabeth Acosta-Conniffs (“Conniff”) student loan debt would result in undue hardship under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8), and it discharged the $112,00 debt. Appellant ECMC appeals the bankruptcy court’s decision. It asserts that the bankruptcy court erred in finding that Conniff satisfied the Eleventh Circuit’s three-part test governing the determination of undue hardship. See Hemar Ins. Corp. of Am. v. Cox (In re Cox), 338 F.3d 1238, 1243 (11th…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marie Brunner v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- In Re Marjorie Jo Faish, Debtor. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency v. Marjorie Jo FaishCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- In Re Sandra Jane Frushour, Debtor. Educational Credit Management Corporation v. Sandra Jane FrushourCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Hemar Insurance v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Price v. DeVos (In re Price)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017