Good v. Indreland

BRIDGES, P.J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. Following a collision between Robert S. Good and Kermit L. Indreland, Good filed a negligence action against In-dreland in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. After two days of hearing evidence and argument of counsel, the jury returned a verdict for Indreland. Aggrieved, Good has appealed and now comes before this Court raising five issues, which are as follows:

I. WAS THE VERDICT CONTRARY TO THE OVERWHELMING WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE, EVINCING BIAS, PASSION, AND PREJUDICE ON BEHALF OF THE JURY?

II. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN DENYING GOOD’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO…