Legal Opinion
Rochon v. Consolidated Construction Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1986No. 85-788PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALFRED A. MANSOUR, Judge Pro Tem.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the trial court maintaining an exception of prescription and dismissing his suit. We affirm.
On April 15, 1980, plaintiff filed a suit for worker’s compensation benefits resulting from injuries he allegedly suffered in the course and scope of his employment on April 17, 1979. That suit was dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff failed to appear in court on the date of the trial. Plaintiff appealed, and we affirmed. Rochon v. Consolidated Const. Co., 452 So.2d 404 (La.App. 3 Cir.1984).
On July 6, 1984, plaintiff filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Limmie West, III v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Alexander v. Town of JeaneretteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Rochon v. Consolidated Const. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Howes v. DoucetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Rochon v. Consolidated Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Drain v. Mid-South Wood Preservers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995