Legal Opinion
Morrison v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 23, 2016No. Case No. 2:14-cv-01207-RFB-PALPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
(Mot Strike — Dkt. #124)
PEGGY A. LEEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the court is Defendants Quest Diagnostics Incorporated and John Hiatt, Ph. D’s Motion to Strike Expert Report and Exclude Testimony; and Declaration of D. Faye Caldwell (Dkt. # 124). The court has considered the motion, the Joinder filed by Defendants Quest Diagnostics and John Hiatt (Dkt. # 126), Plaintiffs Memoranda in Opposition (Dkt. ## 133, 134) and Defendants’ Replies (Dkt. ## 138,141).
BACKGROUND
I. The Amended Complaint.
The Complaint (Dkt. # 1) in this case was filed July 24, 2014. An Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Company Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant. Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Company Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yost v. CarrollDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022