Brennan v. Monaghan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The petitioner, a resident of Michigan, is an owner of harness racing horses and has been engaged, among other endeavors, in that sport and business in a number of States. On August 31, 1954 he filed an application with the respondent for an owner’s license in this State. The governing legislation is popularly known as the Pari-Mutuel Revenue Law (L. 1940, ch. 254, as amd.). The statute established a State Harness Racing Commission, as a division of the Department of State. The commission was granted ‘ ‘ general jurisdiction over all pari-mutuel harness racing activities in the state and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kingsley Books, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foy v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Burke v. Kingsley Books, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
- Perotta v. GregoryNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Everly v. WeaverNew York Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.