Legal Opinion

Burleson v. First National Bank in Tuscumbia

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 13, 1969No. 8 Div. 329PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

Submission was on Motion and Merits.

Motion

Appellee has moved that the appeal be dismissed on the ground that the transcript of the record was not timely filed in this court.

The appeal was taken on September 25, 1968, from a judgment rendered on June 10, 1968.

The appeal is on the record proper, there being no transcript of the evidence in the record. In Calvert v. Calvert, 265 Ala. 529, 92 So.2d 891, following Duke v. State, 264 Ala. 624, 89 So.2d 102, we said that where an appeal is on the record proper without a transcript of the evidence, Supreme Court Rule 37, Revised Rules…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duke v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Calvert v. CalvertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Nettles v. NettlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  4. Keene v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Lovelady v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bredeson v. CroftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API