Legal Opinion
Woodley v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided December 20, 1976No. Motion No. M-18775PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrank S. Rossetti, J.
On March 27, 1976, petitioner Luzella Woodley sustained severe injuries after being struck by an automobile owned by the State and driven by an employee thereof. She thus had until June 25, 1976 to file a claim or notice of intention (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd 3), but failed to do either. Petitioners now move for permission to file a claim out of time pursuant to section 10 of the Court of Claims Act.
The relevant provisions of said section were recently amended (L 1976, ch 280, eff Sept. 1, 1976) and are now found in subdivision 6.* Previously, even though permission to late *891file was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- De Marco v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- De Marco v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rugg v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Crane v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walach v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1977
- Pum Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1977
- Crawford v. City UniversityNew York Court of Claims · 1986