Hearns v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
We have considered the points on appeal and the appellate presentment. From the totality of the evidence we conclude that two reversible errors appear, as follows:
1. Defendant was the subject of an illegal search and seizure, the fruit being a hand gun which should not have been received in evidence. Defendant was stopped for a minor traffic offense and his automobile searched while defendant was being held at gun point. From a careful scrutiny, we believe that probable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Shepard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Sobczak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Ciongoli v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- State v. HearnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1972