Legal Opinion

Hearns v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 24, 1972No. 71-80PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

We have considered the points on appeal and the appellate presentment. From the totality of the evidence we conclude that two reversible errors appear, as follows:

1. Defendant was the subject of an illegal search and seizure, the fruit being a hand gun which should not have been received in evidence. Defendant was stopped for a minor traffic offense and his automobile searched while defendant was being held at gun point. From a careful scrutiny, we believe that probable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  5. Shepard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Sobczak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Ciongoli v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. State v. HearnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API