Q.L.J. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WEBSTER, Judge.
In this juvenile delinquency appeal, appellant claims that the trial court erred when it deviated from the commitment-level placement recommended by the Department of Juvenile Justice. Because we conclude that the trial court relied upon appropriate considerations, which were supported by a preponderance of the evidence, we affirm.
Section 39.052(4)(e), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), reads in pertinent part:
2. If the court determines that commitment to the department [of Juvenile Justice] is appropriate, the intake counselor or ease manager shall recommend to the court the most…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Interest of A.C.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- A.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- C.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- J.W.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- M.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.