Legal Opinion

Q.L.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 1998No. 97-4851PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, Judge.

In this juvenile delinquency appeal, appellant claims that the trial court erred when it deviated from the commitment-level placement recommended by the Department of Juvenile Justice. Because we conclude that the trial court relied upon appropriate considerations, which were supported by a preponderance of the evidence, we affirm.

Section 39.052(4)(e), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), reads in pertinent part:

2. If the court determines that commitment to the department [of Juvenile Justice] is appropriate, the intake counselor or ease manager shall recommend to the court the most…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Interest of A.C.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. A.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. C.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. J.W.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. M.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API