Legal Opinion
City of Oklahoma v. Tuttle
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided August 14, 1985No. 83-1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
471 U.S. 808 (1985)
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY
v.
TUTTLE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF TUTTLE
No. 83-1919.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 8, 1985
Decided June 3, 1985
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Burck Bailey argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Carl Hughes argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were J. LeVonne Chambers and Eric Schnapper.[*]
2Judgment of the CourtJustice Rehnquist, joined by The Chief Justice, Justice White, and Justice O'Connor
In Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 436 U. S. 658 (1978), this Court held that municipalities are "persons" subject to damages liability…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
3Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- (PC) Kamilchu v. Sacramento County Sheriff'sDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Brown v. County of MariposaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Jailen Parks v. Chacano ChristianDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Phillip Lunn v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- United States v. Juan MacIasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015