Legal Opinion
Brownell v. District Court ex rel. County of Larimer
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 11, 1983No. 83SA190PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOHR, Justice.
In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, James E. Brownell seeks relief from an order of the Larimer County District Court denying his motion for change of venue in a dissolution of marriage action brought by his wife, Syndee Brownell. We issued a rule to show cause why venue should not be changed to Garfield County. We now make the rule absolute.
We glean the pertinent facts from copies of uncontroverted affidavits attached to the petitioner’s application for C.A.R. 21 relief. James and Syndee Brownell and their two minor children resided in Glenwood Springs in Garfield…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Lackey v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Board of County Commissioners v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Cliff v. GleasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- People Ex Rel. Stanko v. County CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Floyd Nelson v. Encompass PAHS Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC d/b/a Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Littleton Rule Made Absolute en banc JUSTICE BERKENKOTTER delivered the Opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE BOATRIGHT JUSTICE MÁRQUEZ JUSTICE HOOD JUSTICE GABRIELSupreme Court of Colorado · 2023
- Floyd Nelson v. Encompass PAHS Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC d/b/a Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Littleton Rule Made Absolute en banc JUSTICE BERKENKOTTER delivered the Opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE BOATRIGHT JUSTICE MÁRQUEZ JUSTICE HOOD JUSTICE GABRIELSupreme Court of Colorado · 2023