Legal Opinion

Borden v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 27, 1951No. 4716Published

1Opinion

On Second Motion for Rehearing.

Defendant’s second motion for rehearing has been considered and is overruled. Concerning the construction of Article 5541, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. see: Sovereign Camp Woodmen v. Ruedrich, Tex.Civ.App., 158 S.W. 170; Thetford v. Modern Woodmen, Tex.Civ.App., 273 S.W. 666; Wells v. Margraves, Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W. 881; Heralds of Liberty v. Fern, Tex.Com.App., 296 S.W. 498, and Goodson v. Goldsmith, 131 Tex. 418, 115 S.W.2d 1100.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thetford v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. RuedrichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Goodson v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wells v. MargravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Heralds of Liberty v. FernTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927