Legal Opinion · Dissent

Myers v. Bright

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 6, 1992No. 106, September Term, 1991Published

1DissentRobert M. Bell, Judge

I agree totally with the Court of Special Appeals that the Circuit Court for Frederick County erred when it, relying on the “antiquated version [of the boulevard rule], which gives favored drivers the right-of-way regardless of contributory negligence,” see Myers v. Bright, 327 Md. 395, 404, 609 A.2d 1182, 1186 (1992), granted the petitioner’s (Ida Patricia Myers’) motion for judgment. Bright v. Myers, 88 Md.App. 296, 305, 594 A.2d 1177, 1181 (1991). Because the boulevard rule is inapplicable to the facts sub judice, the intermediate appellate court correctly held that the issues of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meldrum v. Kellam Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Myers v. BrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Dail v. Tri-City Trucking Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Bright v. MyersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API