Malcolm v. Mooresville Cotton Mills
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
The plaintiff introduced in evidence a part of paragraph five of the answer, as follows: “He was caught in a revolving shaft and received injuries resulting in his death.” Thereafter the defendant offered in evidence a portion of the fifth paragraph of the answer, from which said admission was taken, as follows: “Defendant admits that owing to the carelessness and negligence of plaintiff’s intestate, as hereinbefore alleged, he was caught in a revolving shaft and received injuries resulting in his death.”
The .plaintiff excepted to the action of the trial judge in permitting the defendant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Jones v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Wade Ex Rel. Moore v. McLean Contracting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Tudor v. . BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Slayton v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Luther v. First Bank of TroyIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- Hurley v. Gus Blass CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.