Legal Opinion

Mohr v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 16, 1960No. Civ. 38591PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, Chief Judge.

The United States has moved for dismissal of this action brought against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2671 et seq., upon the ground that plaintiff’s exclusive remedy is afforded by the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 39 Stat. 742, as amended, 5 U.S.C.A. § 751 et seq.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the death of her husband who, her complaint alleges, died as a result of an injection of anti-tetanus serum allegedly negligently administered in the course of treatment for an injury incurred in the performance of his duties as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernardo Balancio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Berry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1957
  3. Leahy v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. James F. Hunt and Carol Hunt v. United States of America. Catherine Strinni Hollar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Austin v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1981
  3. Ralph E. Baker v. Frank A. Barber, M.D., and James B. Talmage, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Betty D. McCall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Donna H. Chauncey Wilder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API