Legal Opinion

Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by defendant-appellant Pauline A. Coleman from an order denying her motion to surcharge a receiver in a mortgage foreclosure action and for a direction to the receiver to pay over to said defendant the balance of funds remaining in her hands after the allowance of proper disbursements. The appellant conveyed the premises to the plaintiff in consideration of the payment of the sum of $350, and the foreclosure action was thereupon discontinued. This conveyance satisfied the mortgage debt. (Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Boslyn Estates, 266 App. Div. 244.) The appellant retained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keeney v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Holmes v. GravenhorstNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Central Hanover Bank v. Roslyn Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alden Hotel Co. v. KaninNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Weinstein v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. 200 E. 64th St. Corp. v. ManleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Community Preservation Corp. v. City Terrace Associates Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. TPZ Corp. v. DabbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API