Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heck v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1944No. 46301Published

1DissentBliss, J.

(dissenting) — I agree with the majority that the judgment or order appealed from should be reversed as to the defendants Anderson, Norman, and Kraft Cheese Company. I would go further and reverse as to the defendant Devine. I dissent from the majority opinion for its failure to reverse as to the latter defendant. My reasons for reversal are the same as to all of the defendants.

The facts are the determining factors in this case, and I will amplify the statement thereof in the majority opinion. On January 13, 1942, a Buiek coupé, driven by John Boyd and carrying Edna Heck, Ervin Heck, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Royster v. LederleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Golinvaux v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids, & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Dickinson v. BentleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. Pennsylvania R. v. Anoka Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API