Embassy Tower Care, Inc. v. Tweedy
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This is an appeal by defendant Imogene Tweedy from a default judgment entered against her for care and services provided by plaintiff Embassy Tower Care Center (Embassy). The principal issue on appeal is whether a claim of “newly-discovered” evidence under Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 252(f) may be relied upon to set aside a default judgment. The district court denied Tweedy’s petition to vacate on this and other grounds urged, modifying the judgment downward after adjusting for additional services and credits. We affirm.
Imogene Tweedy is a seventy-five-year-old woman who has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Forsmark v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- State v. NearySupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Kreft v. Fisher Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Harrington v. City of KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Avery v. Harms Implement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Soults Farms, Inc. v. Charles J. Schafer v. Soults Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Benson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- In the Interest of J.J.S.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2001
- Gregory R. Swecker and Beverly F. Swecker v. Midland Power CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019
- State of Iowa, ex rel A.N.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2026