Legal Opinion

Guaranty State Bank of Carthage v. Hull

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The first assignment, as does the second, predicates error upon the court's overruling certain special exceptions to the appellee's answer. The answer by intendment, and in legal effect, fully and sufficiently, as against the exceptions urged, pleads payment of the debt sued for to the president of the bank as such and having authority to collect the debt and receive for the bank such payment.

The third assignment and those following challenge the credit of $2,165.81 upon the overdraft indebtedness sued on by appellant. It appears from the evidence that by prearrangement appellee drew various…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Panhandle National Bank v. EmeryTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Side Oil Co. v. McDormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Ross v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Hull v. Guaranty State Bank of CarthageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API