Guaranty State Bank of Carthage v. Hull
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
The first assignment, as does the second, predicates error upon the court's overruling certain special exceptions to the appellee's answer. The answer by intendment, and in legal effect, fully and sufficiently, as against the exceptions urged, pleads payment of the debt sued for to the president of the bank as such and having authority to collect the debt and receive for the bank such payment.
The third assignment and those following challenge the credit of $2,165.81 upon the overdraft indebtedness sued on by appellant. It appears from the evidence that by prearrangement appellee drew various…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Panhandle National Bank v. EmeryTexas Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- West Side Oil Co. v. McDormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Ross v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Hull v. Guaranty State Bank of CarthageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921