Legal Opinion

C. J. L. Meyer & Sons Co. v. Black

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888Published

Appeal from district court, Grant county; S. F. Wilson, Judge. Assumpsit upon a bill of exchange and attachment by the O. J. L. Meyer & Sons Company, appellees, against Robert Black & Co., appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtBrinkbr, J.

On April 28,1884, plaintiff filed its declaration in assumpsit, •declaring especially upon an acceptance alleged to have been made by Black & Co., the defendant, and upon the common counts for goods sold and delivered, etc., and also filed an affidavit for an attachment charging defendant with having fraudulently concealed and disposed of his property and effects so as to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors, and with having attempted fraudulently to convey and assign, conceal and dispose of his property so as to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors. Plaintiff also filed a bond as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leitensdorfer v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Barney v. . GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. Nicholson v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  4. Abercrombie v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  5. England & Lee v. Reynolds, Devoe & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API