Legal Opinion

SPARROW

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1994No. ID 3237PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3237 MATTER OF SPARROW In Suspension Proceedings Under

8 C.F.R. § 292.3

Decided by Board June 22, 1994 (1) Because the Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative (Form G- 28) is designed to determine whether an individual is an attorney within the meaning of

8 C.F.R. § 1.1(1) (1994), an attorney filing this form has a duty to disclose disciplinary actions or other restrictions on his practice of law in the bars of courts in jurisdictions other than those in which he claims to be in good standing. (2) Where an attorney in disciplinary proceedings under

8 C.F.R. §…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gadda v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API