Legal Opinion

United Lace & Braid Mfg. Co. v. Barthels Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 24, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by the United Tace & Braid Manufacturing Company against the Barthels Manufacturing Company. On motion by complainant to- take depositions.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

[1] The application denied by memorandum of June 23, 1914, has been renewed upon additional papers, which are intended to comply with Equity Rule 56 (198 Fed. xxxiv, 115 C. C. A. xxxiv). While these papers do not set forth in detail entirely satisfactory reasons; showing inability to produce upon the trial the witnesses named, or others who would testify in the same way upon the same matters, nor just what evidence each witness will give with respect to the issues in the case, and while therefore the rule is not yet fully met, in the way that the usual application to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meyers v. Occidental Oil Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API