Tackett v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Krueger, Judge.
Conviction is for an assault with intent to commit rape; punishment is assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.
Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction of an assault with intent to commit rape. He takes the position that if the State’s testimony shows him to be guilty of any offense, it is either rape or aggravated assault and not assault with intent to rape. A careful review of the testimony leads us to a different conclusion.
The injured female testified that she was 17 years of age at the time…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Bratton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
3Cited by10 opinions
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Nielson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.