Legal Opinion · Dissent

Borchers v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 19, 1990No. Docket No. 3576-86Published

P's claimed an investment tax credit for 1982 in respect of computer equipment purchased by P in 1982 and leased by him to a corporation wholly owned by P's. On their face the leases were for 12-month terms and contained no provision for renewal. All of the leases were in fact renewed in 1983, again for 12-month terms.

Read the full summary

P's claimed an investment tax credit for 1982 in respect of computer equipment purchased by P in 1982 and leased by him to a corporation wholly owned by P's. On their face the leases were for 12-month terms and contained no provision for renewal. All of the leases were in fact renewed in 1983, again for 12-month terms. Similarly, P had leased other equipment to the corporation in 1981 on 12-month leases which were renewed in 1982, some of which were again renewed in 1983. All the renewals were for 12-month periods with substantially the same provisions, except that individual leases had…

1Dissent

KÓRNER, Judge:

I respectfully dissent. The Eighth Circuit did not remand this case to us for any purpose except to explain the basis for our first opinion herein. Borchers v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1988-349, vacated and remanded 889 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1989). I think that we could have and should have done so very simply, without changing the result of the first opinion, which was correct.

The basis for respondent’s determination, quoted in the majority opinion, was that petitioners had not “established that the lease term * * * was for less than one-half the useful life of the equipment.”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donald G. McNamara and Valerie J. McNamara and Robert F. Christiansen and Lucille L. Christiansen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Sauey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Richard J. Borchers and Jane E. Borchers v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API