Legal Opinion

EX PARTE McCARTNEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 7, 1998No. 1970686PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCartney Construction Company ("McCartney"), a defendant in an action pending in the Etowah Circuit Court, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing that court to vacate its order denying McCartney's motion to dismiss, and to dismiss McCartney as a defendant. We grant the petition.

Maurice Dwight Timmons, the plaintiff in the pending action, is an employee of McCartney. He suffered an on-the-job injury. The documents filed with this Court indicate that Timmons is covered by the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq. Timmons sued McCartney and a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Asphalt Hot MixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Padgett v. Neptune Water Meter Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Murdock v. STEEL PROCESSING SERVICESSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Powell v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Progress Rail Services Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex parte Austal USA, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  3. Cason v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. Ex Parte Salvation Army, 2100033 (ala.civ.app. 2-18-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Ex parte Tenax Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API