Legal Opinion
Sanford v. Stoll
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 23, 1974No. 1178PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant in the sum of $4,600 actual damages and $15,000 punitive damages in a claim filed for conversion of property and invasion of privacy. This claim arose out of defendant’s repossession of plaintiff’s automobile. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
Six points are raised for reversal: (1) absence of an indispensable party; (2) withdrawal of defendant’s attorney; (3) error in giving instructions; (4) directed verdict and judgment n. o. v.; (5) trial court’s order of remittitur; and (6) cumulative error.(1) The Bank was not an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zamora v. SmalleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Montgomery Ward v. LarragoiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. WhiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Public Service Co. of NM v. First Judicial Dist. CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. ClemonsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ivy v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Polk County Bank v. SpitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Berry v. BerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- La Madera Community Ditch Ass'n v. Sandia Peak Ski Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995