Legal Opinion

Cerussite Mining Co. v. Anderson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1903No. 2349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Fremont County.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, J. ■

The complaint stated three good causes of action against defendant, in three counts, upon a past-due promissory note, and two dishonored hank checks, and demanded judgment for $830.62 and interest.

The answer admitted the execution and delivery of the note and hank checks; attempted to aver duress in the execution and delivery of the same; averred payment of a large part of the sums claimed to he *308due; ou information and belief averred that plaintiffs were not the owners of the note and checks sued on, and averred willingness to pay whatever sum should be found due.

A replication…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leahy v. DunlapSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Home Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Vaux v. HensalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API