Legal Opinion

Bell v. Samaritano

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1990No. A90A0589PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellants, Rhonda Bell, Loyd Richard Deaver and Olen Pirkle Smith are hairdressers who formerly worked in a shop owned by the appellee, Mario Samaritano. Deaver rented space to open his own hairstyling shop approximately one mile from Samaritano’s and Bell and Smith joined him at that new place of business. All three appellants resigned on the same day and Bell and Smith took with them certain index cards containing the names and addresses of customers and, most importantly, bearing notations as to the proper formulas for chemical processing administered to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Irvin v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Hunter v. HardnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Von Hoff v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Smith v. MyrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Bell v. SamaritanoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API