Prophet v. State

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of possessing less than 28 grams of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. By three points of error, she attacks the sufficiency of the evidence on the element of possession, the evidence that the substance was methamphetamine, and the admission of evidence obtained pursuant to a search she alleges was incident to an illegal arrest. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

By point three, appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence obtained by a search that she avers was invalid because it was a result of an illegal…