Walsh v. Woarms
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Albert L. Woarms and another, copartners doing trade and business tinder the firm name of style of D. S. Hess & Co., from a judgment of the County Court of Queens county in favor of the plain tiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 24th day of October, 1904, upon the verdict of a jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, J.:
The plaintiff has recovered a judgment against the defendants for a balance claimed to be due him upon a contract to supply certain labor and materials to defendants, for which they promised to pay §320, and from that judgment this appeal is taken.
Before the commencement of this action, plaintiff sold and assigned to the Acme Security Company all sums of money due or to become due upon the contract, and the following notice thereof was served upon the defendants:
“ Gentlemen.— Please take notice that Mr. Samuel Walsh has. this day assigned to the Acme Security Company, of 289 4th…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Collins v. McWilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In re FedermanNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Michael v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
- Selleck v. Manhattan Fire Alarm Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
- Joffe-Mayer Co. v. RadenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912