Legal Opinion

Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark v. Beha

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 5, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The altogether local question raised by this bill is properly before this court in any event, because of the diversity of citizenship, but the convocation of three judges to consider the cause depends upon its constitutional aspect. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Russell, 261 U. S. 290, 43 S. Ct. 353, 67 L. Ed. 659; Prendergast v. N. Y. Tel. Co., 262 U. S. 43, 43 S. Ct. 466, 67 L. Ed. 853. However, unless the constitutional questions raised be colorable or fraudulent, our jurisdiction as a statutory court extends to the local question, even though we do not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. Paul A. McGinley District Attorney, County of Lehigh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  4. Grand Central Aircraft Co. v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  5. Fisher v. BruckerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API