Legal Opinion

Emery v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1897Published

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, J.'

These cases have been reserved to General Term, and are brought by persons owning property in the city of Cincinnati, abutting upon certain alleys which have been im proved by the Board of Administration of said city under the act of March 30th, 1893, (90 V. 258, Local Laws). The actions seek to enjoin the assessments made by reason of such improvements, upon the ground that the laws under which they were made are unconstitutional and void. The facts in the cases are not disputed, and the questions at issue are raised by demurrers to the petition.

The act of March 30th, 1893,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richlands Iron Co. v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
  2. Johnson v. Norton Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API