Dick v. Schoener
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Appealing from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict against him in an action for damages for personal injuries, plaintiff contends that the court erred in giving and refusing instructions, particularly that, as in Taha v. Finegold, 81 Cal.App.2d 536 [184 P.2d 533], the instructions overemphasized contributory negligence and plaintiff’s duty.
Facts
This accident took place in plain daylight at the intersection of Dwight Way and Milvia Street, Berkeley. Plaintiff, a pedestrian, was walking northerly in the easterly crosswalk on Milvia Street when he was struck by the ear driven by defendant.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Strandt v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Hirshberg v. StraussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Taha v. FinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gilbert v. Pessin Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Karageozian v. BostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956