Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Herrick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 7, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEkdjcott, J.

The questions to be determined in this case arise upon the following facts: William 0. Edmands was formerly guardian of Dwight F. Boyden; and James F. Edmands and John J. Rayner .were sureties on his bond as guardian. William 0. Edmands became insolvent and resigned his trust, and the plaintiff was appointed guardian in his place. At the time of his resignation he was largely indebted to the estate of his ward, and his sureties were called upon to pay to the plaintiff the balance due from him to the ward’s estate. They were unable to pay, and a compromise was entered into with the permission…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. LedyardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  2. Rindge v. SandfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meeker v. WaldronNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. VaniceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Bearse v. LebowichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Pendery v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Shillito Co. v. Henderson-Achert Lithographing Co.Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API