Legal Opinion

Harper v. Marcorp, Ltd.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 3, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2020-0980Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIS HARPER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-cv-980 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MARCORP, LTD., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On November 30, 2022, after a three-day jury trial, a jury rendered a unanimous verdict in this case, finding that defendants had failed to re-employ U.S. Army Reservist Willis Harper when he returned from uniformed service, violating the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), 38 U.S.C. § 4312. See Verdict Form, ECF No. 54. Accordingly, the jury awarded…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. Banister v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API