Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1951No. Civ. A. 12110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

The matter is before me on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint.

The action is based on a policy of insurance issued upon several valuable horses, among which was one known as “Palatine King”, insured for $19,200. The policy was issued for the period July 27, 1949 to July 27, 1950. ' On July 3, 1950, “Palatine King” suffered an injury. Plaintiff alleges that the injury was of such a nature as to require immediate destruction of the animal. The policy provided that no liability should attach in the event of slaughter of the animal unless the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butler v. Hartford Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Marsh v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  3. Ross v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Ross v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API