Legal Opinion

Rory H. v. Mary M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a joint custody and visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Tallmer, J.), dated December 23, 2003, as, after a hearing, awarded custody of the parties’ child to the mother.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The findings of the Family Court in a custody matter should be accorded great deference on appeal since the Family Court is in the best position to evaluate the testimony, character, and sincerity of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Canazon v. CanazonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Olson v. OlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Blanc v. LarcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riccio v. RiccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Coulter v. ScalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Walsh v. BadickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API