Legal Opinion

Clark v. Bullock

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Cass Circuit Court.—Hon. Foster P. Wright, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

The bill of exceptions, in order to become a part of the record, must be filed “ during the term of the court, at which it is taken and not after,” (W. S. 1043, section 28; Id. 1044, section 31; Fulkerson v. Houts, 55 Mo. 301, and cas. cit.,) unless by consent of parties entered of record, it be filed at a subsequent period and *536within the time thus agreed upon, (Mentzing v. P. R. R. Co., 64 Mo. 25, and cas. cit.) Neither the rule in its statutory-strictness, nor as relaxed by the decisions above noted having been complied with, we can notice nothing which the bill of exceptions, so called,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Fulkerson v. HoutsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Mentzing v. Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Exchange National Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Trustees of Christian University v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Robertson v. HopeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Pope v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Chapman v. J. W. Beltz & Sons Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API