Legal Opinion

Nash v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 25, 1972PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

In this drug case, we are called upon to decide whether the search and seizure was reasonable, and consonant with the Fourth Amendment, under the standards of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). The defendants were tried and convicted separately upon charges of possession of heroin with intent to sell and possession of a hypodermic syringe. Their appeals have been consolidated.

I

Near midnight, on the shoulder of a dark and isolated portion of U. S. 13, the defendants were discovered by the State police standing near a parked automobile bearing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. State v. CulverSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bromwell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. State v. VasquezArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  5. State v. WausnockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API