Legal Opinion

A C Hoyle Co. v. Sperry Rand Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1983No. Docket 64037PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, A. C. Hoyle Company, appeals as of right from an April 13, 1982, order of partial summary judgment against it pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1), failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

In its complaint plaintiff alleged that it had entered into a contract with Bethlehem Steel Corporation to supply deck machinery for four ocean-faring oil tankers which Bethlehem was building. The machinery to be supplied by plaintiff was designed to be hydraulically powered.

Plaintiff contracted with Vickers, a division of the defendant corporation, for the design, manufacture, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mid Continent Aircraft Corp. v. Curry County Spraying Service, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. McGhee v. GMC Truck & Coach Division, General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ritter v. Custom Chemicides, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sullivan Industries, Inc. v. Double Seal Glass Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API