Legal Opinion

People v. Nordstrom

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 13, 1966No. Gen. 65-88PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

The defendant, Albert Edward Nordstrom, was convicted on July 29, 1964, for misbranding drugs, in that he knowingly and unlawfully sold a dangerous drug at retail without a prescription, contrary to the provisions of sections 17 and 29 of the Uniform Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act. (Ill Rev Stats 1963, c 111½, pars 417 and 429.) The offense was a second offense, yet the defendant was placed on probation on August 12, 1964. On April 30, 1965, his probation was revoked; he was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than one year and six months and not more than two years; and he…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. People v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. The People v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Village of Niles v. SzczesnyIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. PickettMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. De GrootAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. The PEOPLE v. NordstromIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. JuveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. People v. SmiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API